Photo: Dave Blackey/Getty Images |
Radio National is conducting an experiment where listeners
can (supposedly) influence the practice of rearing a pig named Wilbur 101. A poll was conducted to determine if Wilbur
101 should be castrated. The voters said
‘No’ but the farmers used their veto power and decided to castrate him
anyway. The reason for this is explained
in an article by Tammi Jonas.
I appreciate Tammi’s enthusiasm for transparency in farming
and think that an experiment such as this one helps to bring the issues of
animal agriculture to the attention of the public. I don’t really understand the point of having
a poll though if it can be overridden when the results don’t match the desired
outcome.
When reading the original article regarding the poll, I felt
that there was a bias toward castration and very little information was
provided about the process or possible alternatives. I will be curious to see what future decisions
are presented or if the experiment is abandoned altogether.
Aarod chose not to castrate Kevin and Francis and I personally think this was a great decision... and no doubt they agree.
My own poll from 17 May is not working, so I have removed it from the blog. Apologies to those that voted but the results were not tallying. I was very interested to see the results, so feel free to post comments instead.
So the voters chose not to castrate him but the farmers vetoed? What is the point of a poll system then? That's disappointing news!
ReplyDelete